Spring Framework vs. Struts: Uncover the strengths, features, and use cases of these top Java web development frameworks.
More...
Java is a top programming language, used by over 30% of developers worldwide. In Java web development, Spring and Struts are key frameworks, each offering distinct benefits and features.
Spring was created by VMware in October 2002 as an open-source Java framework. It's renowned for enhancing web application development through key features like dependency injection and inversion of control. These elements simplify creating flexible, portable, and testable applications. Notable tools within the Spring ecosystem include Spring Boot, favored by 62% of developers.
Struts was introduced by Apache in May 2000 and updated to Struts 2, employs the MVC design pattern. This offers a clear method for building web applications. Despite being a heavyweight framework compared to Spring, Struts is chosen by over thousands of firms for their Java web development projects due to its ready-made classes that enhance flexibility and simplicity, particularly for servlets and J2EE applications.
This article provides a comprehensive comparison between two popular frameworks: the Spring Framework vs Struts, focusing on their features and differences to aid Java developers in making informed choices. Spring's lightweight, modular approach contrasts with Struts' structured style. Understanding their strengths helps developers select the best framework for their projects.
Introduction to Spring Framework and Struts
Spring and Struts are integral to Java web development. Each offers specialized capabilities and support. Understanding their histories elucidates their significance today.
History of Spring Framework
Spring significantly impacted Java's development landscape by introducing concepts like Dependency Injection and Inversion of Control, which streamline web application development. Spring's extensive ecosystem includes Spring Boot and Spring Security, making it a favorite among developers and companies.
History of Struts Framework
Struts, developed by the Apache Software Foundation, is known for its robust use of the MVC architecture, which separates application data, logic, and presentation layers. Its ready-made tools facilitate faster development and code clarity. Companies such as Red Hat appreciate its diverse view options and straightforward testing capabilities.
Key Features of Spring Framework
The Spring Framework excels with its robust tools for Java web development, making it a popular choice among developers.
1. IoC Container
Spring's IoC Container simplifies Dependency Injection, reducing code complexity and enhancing maintainability and testability.
2. Data Access Framework
Spring offers a top-tier data access framework integrating JDBC technologies and ORM tools like Hibernate, ensuring efficient transaction handling.
3. MVC Framework
Spring MVC facilitates web application development without relying on tag libraries, promoting clear code organization.
4. TestContext Framework
Spring's TestContext framework supports extensive integration and unit testing, ensuring comprehensive application testing.
Feature | Description | Benefits |
|---|---|---|
IoC Container | Manages object dependencies | Reduces complexity, improves testability |
Data Access Framework | Integrates with JDBC and Hibernate | Efficient transaction management, flexible data access |
MVC Framework | Utilizes the MVC design pattern | Clear separation of concerns, quicker development |
TestContext Framework | Provides testing support and annotations | Enhanced, comprehensive testing capabilities |
Together, these features make the Spring Framework a highly flexible and preferred choice for Java web development, suitable for both small and large projects.
Key Features of Struts Framework
The Struts Framework is recognized for its well-organized architecture, crucial for Java web development.
1. POJO Forms and Actions
Struts supports Plain Old Java Objects (POJOs), improving code readability and reusability, and simplifying the development process.
2. Tag Support
Struts' tag library accelerates development by simplifying the creation of web components, resulting in faster development times and more responsive interfaces.
3. Seamless Integration
Struts integrates seamlessly with various technologies, enhancing the development cycle by avoiding compatibility issues.
4. View Technologies
Struts supports multiple view technologies such as JSP, Velocity, and Freemarker, providing developers with options for application customization.
Struts is a solid choice for developing and maintaining large-scale, legacy web applications.
Pros and Cons of Spring Framework
Spring, created by Pivotal Software in 2002, plays a pivotal role in Java web development. Here are its advantages and disadvantages:
Pros
- 1Lightweight Framework: Uses fewer resources, enhancing performance.
- 2Non-Invasive Design: Developers have freedom without being tied to specific classes.
- 3Comprehensive Ecosystem: Supports tools like Spring Boot and Spring Security, ideal for microservices and small web applications.
- 4Independent Layers: Modular architecture facilitates clean code and integration with other frameworks.
- 5Better Testing Capabilities: Easier and more effective testing.
Cons
- 1Steep Learning Curve: Complexity can be overwhelming for beginners.
- 2Configuration Overhead: Initial setup, especially with XML files, can be time-consuming.
- 3Security Considerations: Requires meticulous attention to security configurations.
Pros and Cons of Struts Framework
The Struts Framework also has its strengths and weaknesses:
Pros
- 1Ease of Integration: Works well with other technologies.
- 2Efficient Use of Annotations: Simplifies configuration.
- 3Utilizes OGNL: Simplifies coding.
- 4Heightened Testability: Enhances application testing.
- 5Simplifies Configuration Processes: Reduces manual coding effort.
Cons
- 1Less Accessible to Novice Developers: Complex for beginners.
- 2Poor Documentation: Lacks comprehensive guides.
- 3Frequent Compatibility Issues: Can be inconsistent across systems.
- 4Complex Background Processes: Difficult to manage.
- 5Confined to a Single Servlet: Limits flexibility.
Architecture Comparison: Spring Framework vs. Struts
Spring and Struts frameworks take distinct approaches in Java web development, catering to different application types.
Spring Framework Architecture
Spring Framework features a layered architecture, enhancing modularity through Dependency Injection (DI) and Inversion of Control (IoC). This architecture, divided into components such as Core Container, Spring AOP, Spring ORM, and Spring Web, promotes easy integration with Java EE technologies. It’s particularly suitable for developing microservices.
Struts Framework Architecture
Struts employs the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, which excels at separating business logic, user interfaces, and data. Its core components include Controller (ActionServlet), Model (ActionForm), and View (JSP). This makes Struts ideal for maintaining legacy systems.
Aspect | Spring Framework | Struts Framework |
|---|---|---|
Architecture | Layered | MVC |
Core Principles | DI, IoC | MVC, J2EE |
Modules | Multiple (Core, AOP, ORM, Web) | Single (ActionServlet, ActionForm, JSP) |
Applications | Enterprise-level, Microservices | Legacy, Monolithic |
Differences in Development Approach
Spring and Struts differ in their development approaches, each preferred for specific reasons.
1. Modularity
Spring's modular framework allows developers to work on individual components without affecting the entire project. In contrast, Struts' interconnected structure requires changes across multiple files, making Spring more suitable for large, complex projects.
2. Ease of Learning
Struts, with its straightforward design pattern, is initially easier for beginners. However, Spring’s extensive framework offers more tools, though it requires a steeper learning curve.
3. Scalability
Spring’s design, especially with Spring Boot, supports scalability, making it ideal for both small and large projects. Struts, being a mature framework, may struggle with modern scalability demands due to its architecture.
4. Performance
Spring is known for its lightweight, fast performance, continuously updated to meet modern standards. Struts, while reliable, can lag due to its older, heavier design.
Criteria | Spring Framework | Struts Framework |
|---|---|---|
Development Modularity | Highly Modular | Less Modular, Changes Across Multiple Files |
Learning Curve | Steeper, Advanced Concepts | Gentler, Easier for Beginners |
Scalability | Highly Scalable, Suitable for Microservices | Limited Scalability, Best for Monolithic Apps |
Performance | Faster, Lightweight | Reliable, Heavyweight |
Companies Using Spring Framework vs. Struts
Many major companies worldwide, such as TransferWise and Indeed, prefer the Spring Framework for its scalability and performance efficiency. Struts remains popular among companies, including Red Hat, for its robustness in maintaining legacy applications.
Company | Framework Adopted | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|
 | Spring | Modular, scalable solutions, lightweight |
 | Spring | Flexibility, performance efficiency |
 | Struts | Maintaining legacy applications, MVC architecture |
Which Framework to Choose: Use Cases and Recommendations
Choosing between Spring and Struts depends on project requirements. Spring’s modular and flexible framework is ideal for new, scalable projects, especially microservices. Companies like TransferWise and Indeed highlight Spring’s strength in building robust, flexible systems.
Struts, with its MVC architecture, is better suited for maintaining large, legacy systems. It’s a solid choice for projects requiring stability and integration with older technologies.
Criteria | Spring Framework | Struts Framework |
|---|---|---|
Popular Use Case | Building microservices apps | Maintaining legacy applications |
Key Feature | Modularity and flexibility | Tag libraries and MVC support |
Developer Preference | 62% majority | Legacy support |
Ease of Use | Steeper learning curve | More accessible for simpler tasks |
Contract us for hiring Java developers
Get in touch
for hiring Spring or Struts developers
Frequently Asked Questions about Spring Framework vs Struts
The Spring Framework excels in Java web development due to its use of Dependency Injection and Inversion of Control, simplifying application management and enhancing flexibility. Tools like Spring Boot and Spring Security further aid in building scalable and testable applications.
The IoC Container in Spring manages object creation and dependencies, reducing setup complexity and enhancing maintainability and testability.
Spring began as an open-source project aimed at simplifying the development of large-scale applications in Java. It introduced Dependency Injection and Inversion of Control, gaining rapid adoption for its powerful features and flexibility.
Struts is known for its MVC design, which separates application logic, presentation, and data. It supports POJO forms and actions, has a robust tag library, and integrates well with other technologies.
Spring offers more modularity, faster development with POJOs, and a comprehensive ecosystem of tools, making it ideal for new, scalable applications. Its non-invasive design and independent layers also facilitate clean code and integration with other frameworks.
Yes, the Spring Framework can be complex to learn and has a high configuration overhead, especially with XML. Security configurations also require careful attention.
Struts integrates seamlessly with other tools and technologies, simplifying development and updates with annotations and minimizing compatibility issues.
Spring features a layered architecture with components like Core Container, AOP, ORM, and Web, promoting modularity and flexibility in large-scale applications.
Major companies like TransferWise and Indeed use Spring for its scalability, flexibility, and comprehensive toolset.
Choose based on project size and design needs. Spring is best for new, scalable projects, while Struts is suited for maintaining older applications.
Spring emphasizes modularity and scalability, with a steeper learning curve and better performance. Struts is simpler to start with but has limitations in flexibility and scalability.