Solutions Architect vs Technical Architect: who does what? Let's discuss differences, similarities, key skills, career progression, and more!
More...
Wondering about the differences between the role of a Solutions Architect and a Technical Architect? Look no further!
Solutions Architects focus on aligning technology with business needs, crafting comprehensive solutions that address specific challenges while bridging the gap between technical and non-technical stakeholders.
In contrast, Technical Architects emphasize the technological "how", making intricate technical decisions about system architectures, technology choices, and ensuring these designs are seamlessly implemented by development teams.
While both roles are undeniably technical, the Solutions Architect leans more towards aligning technology with business goals, whereas the Technical Architect delves deeper into the technological aspects to ensure robustness and scalability.
Read on for a detailed comparison covering similarities, differences, key skills and experience, career progression, and more!
Solutions Architect Vs Technical Architect: Side-by-Side Comparison
Solutions Architect | Technical Architect | |
|---|---|---|
Focus | - Aligns IT solutions with business needs. - Ensures solutions integrate with existing IT landscape. | - Dives into technical details of solutions. - Ensures optimal and sustainable technical decisions. |
Key Responsibilities | - Translates business requirements. - Designs integrative IT solutions. - Bridges tech and non-tech communication. - Coordinates solution delivery. - Provides implementation governance. | - Creates technical blueprints. - Ensures technical feasibility. - Recommends tech stacks. - Sets technical standards. - Manages technical risks. |
Approach to Problem Solving | - Strategically aligns with business. - Collaborative liaison between stakeholders. | - Relies on deep technical expertise. - Systemic, scalable, and maintainable focus. |
Tool Usage | - BPMN for process modeling. - Decision frameworks. - Collaboration tools like Confluence. | - UML for system modeling. - Architectural patterns. - System evaluation tools. |
Solutions Architect vs Technical Architect: Similarities Between Roles
Solutions Architects and Technical Architects share several similarities owing to their architectural roles.
- 1Holistic View: Both roles require a broad understanding of technology landscapes. They must look beyond isolated components and consider how all elements fit together cohesively.
- 2Stakeholder Collaboration: They both frequently collaborate with various stakeholders, from business executives to developers, ensuring that the final solution or design meets the requirements and constraints of all involved.
- 3Decision-making: Both roles are instrumental in making crucial decisions. While their focus areas may differ, their choices directly impact the direction of projects.
- 4Continuous Learning: Given the rapidly evolving tech landscape, both need to stay updated with emerging technologies and best practices to make informed decisions.
- 5Problem-Solving: At their core, both roles are problem-solvers. They address challenges, whether business-oriented or technical, and find the best route to a solution.
While their core responsibilities and focus areas differ, these shared aspects stem from their overarching goal of designing efficient, effective, and cohesive systems.
Solutions Architect Skills & Experience
Solutions Architects primarily focus on aligning technology strategies with business needs. They design comprehensive solutions for specific business challenges, ensuring viability and feasibility by integrating various technology components. Their scope extends beyond pure technology, requiring a holistic understanding of business context and requirements. Consequently, they often interact with both technical and non-technical stakeholders to comprehend needs and translate proposed solutions into understandable terms.
Here's a breakdown of required skills and experience for Solutions Architects:
Technical Architect Skills & Experience
On the other hand, Technical Architects delve deeper into the technological aspects of solutions, concentrating on the "how". Their role revolves around detailed technical decisions, such as choosing specific technologies, setting technical standards, and defining system architectures.
While their expertise is deeply rooted in technology specifications, they primarily collaborate with development and engineering teams to guarantee that the technical design is implemented correctly and adheres to best practices.
Solutions Architect vs Technical Architect: Key Roles in Fintech Projects
Both Solutions Architects and Technical Architects play indispensable roles in Fintech projects.
System Design and Strategy
Solutions Architects often focus on high-level design, ensuring it aligns with business objectives. However, in smaller organizations or complex projects, they might also delve into more granular technical details. Technical Architects, while concentrating on detailed technical design and the soundness of chosen technologies, always keep the broader business objectives in sight to ensure alignment.
Integration and Compliance
Both roles significantly contribute to ensuring Fintech solutions integrate seamlessly with other systems. While Solutions Architects typically concentrate on high-level integrations, aligning with business needs, and ensuring overarching compliance, Technical Architects emphasize technical compliance with industry standards. (In larger setups, though, dedicated roles like Integration Architects might handle these specifics.)
Innovation and Implementation
Solutions Architects are pivotal in ideating and designing innovative solutions, but they also play a role in the implementation phase, ensuring the solution is executed as envisioned. Technical Architects, while deeply hands-on with the actual implementation, are also instrumental in bringing innovative technical approaches to the table.
Collaboration and Communication
Both roles are critical in bridging communication gaps in Fintech projects. While Solutions Architects often interface with business stakeholders, translating their needs into technical requirements, Technical Architects, besides working closely with development teams, also engage with business stakeholders to ensure technical solutions align with business goals.
Solutions Architects and Technical Architects collaboratively ensure platforms are strategically sound, efficient, innovative, and compliant, meeting both business requirements and industry regulations.
Solutions Architect Vs Technical Architect: Career Progression
Note that a title in one company might be slightly different in another.
Professionals can transition into Solutions or Technical Architect roles from various backgrounds and domains. Some might have started in non-technical roles, such as business analysts or project managers, and over time, developed the requisite technical and strategic acumen.
Others might hail from specialized fields such as database administration, cybersecurity, or even domain-specific consultancy.
The unifying factor for all architects, regardless of their origin, is the ability to merge technical know-how with a broader business or system perspective.
Career Progression for Solutions Architects
- 1Solutions Architect: Designs and integrates complex solutions, liaises between business and technical teams, and addresses specific organizational needs.
- 2Senior Solutions Architect: Leads major projects, shapes the business's tech strategy, and mentors budding architects.
- 3Lead/Chief Solutions Architect: At this leadership level, they oversee architect teams, guide strategic decisions on technology, and dictate the overall solutions strategy.
Career Progression for Technical Architects
- 1Technical Architect: Designs, reviews, and governs the architecture of software systems ensuring alignment with business requirements.
- 2Senior/Chief Technical Architect: Leads critical architectural projects, ensures system resilience, and oversees the technical strategy across projects or departments.
Both Solutions and Technical Architects offer a breadth of specializations based on organizational and domain needs.
For instance, while some Solutions Architects may focus on enterprise-wide strategies or specific industries, Technical Architects might specialize in areas like infrastructure, software design, or security. As technology evolves, these roles continually adapt, presenting a dynamic landscape of opportunities and specializations.
Beyond these trajectories, some architects, given their in-depth knowledge of technology and business, might transition into strategic roles like CTOs or CIOs. Others might opt for consulting roles, leveraging their expertise to guide other businesses.
Frequently Asked Questions
Most Solutions Architects possess between 5-10 years of experience in fields like software development, system engineering, or IT consulting. This ensures they have a broad understanding of technological solutions and business needs. However, the exact years can vary based on industry and company size, with the quality of experience and expertise in pertinent technologies also being crucial factors.
Aspiring Technical Architects generally accumulate around 5-10 years in technical roles, including positions as software developers, system administrators, or DevOps engineers. This hands-on experience is vital for making informed decisions about system design and integration. As with Solutions Architects, the exact duration might differ based on the industry and other variables, but the depth and relevance of the experience are paramount.
Yes, both roles benefit from coding experience. Solutions Architects typically have a foundational understanding of coding, enabling them to grasp technical challenges, though they rarely code in their role.
In contrast, Technical Architects often have deeper hands-on coding experience, allowing them to make informed decisions on system design and occasionally contribute directly to coding tasks, especially during initial project phases.
While both roles may interact with clients or stakeholders, the Solutions Architect typically has more frequent client-facing responsibilities. They liaise between the technical team and the client to ensure solutions meet business objectives.
Solutions Architects tend to have a broader understanding of industry-specific challenges. They design solutions tailored to address the unique needs of industries like healthcare, finance, or e-commerce.
Technical Architects dive deeper into software and hardware intricacies. Their primary focus revolves around the technical design, implementation, and optimization of solutions.
While both roles contribute, Technical Architects often have a more decisive role in technology selection, ensuring the chosen tech aligns with the architectural vision and design.
Yes, transitions between the two roles are possible, especially if the professional has a robust foundation in both business and technical aspects. The shift would require focused upskilling in the specific domain they are moving into.
While this can vary based on location, company size, and individual experience, both roles are typically well-compensated due to their significance in project success. Differences in salaries are often influenced more by experience, location, and company size than by the specific title.
We hope you enjoyed our article on the differences between the role of a Solutions Architect and that of a Technical Architect.
If your company is looking for IT professionals and you are interested in IT recruitment or IT staff augmentation, please contact us and we will be happy to help you find the right person for the job.
To be the first to know about our latest blog posts, follow us on LinkedIn and Facebook!