Staff Augmentation vs Consulting: What Is the Difference?

Staff augmentation boosts your team's capacity and skills for a specific period, while consulting provides expertise and advice to help you navigate challenges or strategies more effectively. Both approaches offer valuable benefits, depending on what your organization needs at the moment. Let’s see what situations they fit the most!

Staff Augmentation vs Consulting: Differences

IT Staff Augmentation is the best option when you're working on a project and realize you need a couple of extra hands or specific expertise that your current team doesn't have. Instead of going through the lengthy process of hiring new full-time employees, you can augment your team temporarily.

This means you bring in external professionals to fill those gaps, often working remotely. They work under your management and alongside your existing team, just like they're part of the crew. The focus here is on adding capacity and specific skills to your current setup without a long-term commitment.

Consulting, on the other hand, is basically bringing in a guide when you're exploring unknown territory. Consultants are experts you hire for their knowledge and experience in advising on strategy, identifying problems, and proposing solutions.

They assess your situation, recommend a course of action, and might help implement it. However, their role is more about providing expertise and advice rather than augmenting your workforce. They usually have a higher level of autonomy and might oversee projects, rather than being integrated into your team structure

Key Takeaways

Staff augmentation is temporarily expanding your team with specific skills and capacity, integrating external professionals into your workforce, often for a set period.

In contrast, consulting involves bringing in experts to provide strategic advice and solutions, focusing on leveraging their knowledge and experience rather than expanding your team's size.

When to Use Staff Augmentation vs Consulting Services

When deciding between staff augmentation and consulting services, consider your project's scope, the expertise of your current team, and your long-term goals. Both options can be cost-effective and flexible, but they cater to different needs.

Short-Term Needs & Specialized Skills

Staff Augmentation: Ideal for when you need extra manpower or specific technical skills for a project. For example, adding a Kotlin developer to your team for an Android app project when your existing team specializes in iOS development.

Consulting Services: While they can also address short-term needs, consultants are better suited for providing strategic insights and solving complex problems. For instance, guiding your digital transformation strategy.

Budget Considerations

Both options avoid the long-term commitments of hiring full-time staff, but augmentation is typically more cost-effective for expanding manpower or technical capability in the short term. Consulting might require a higher initial investment but is valuable for its strategic guidance and potential to solve costly long-term problems.

Control and Integration vs. Strategic Insight and Problem-Solving

Staff Augmentation: Offers direct control over the project and ensures external staff integrate into your team, maintaining your company culture and management style.

Consulting Services: Provide high-level strategic insights and objective assessments. They're not integrated into your team in the same way but offer valuable external perspectives and specialized problem-solving skills.

Objective Assessment & Knowledge Transfer

Consulting Services: Shine in offering unbiased evaluations and strategies for modernization, as well as transferring knowledge that can have a lasting impact on your team. This is crucial for adopting new technologies or overcoming legacy system challenges.

Staff Augmentation: Less about strategic overhaul and more about immediate, tactical needs. Augmentation doesn't focus on changing your strategies or systems at a foundational level.

Staff Augmentation Vs. Consulting: What to Think Through Before Choosing

Before choosing, clearly define your objectives, consider the duration you'll need external support, and evaluate whether your needs are tactical (staff augmentation) or strategic (consulting services).

For instance, if your goal is to quickly expand your team's capacity with specific skills for a project, augmentation is the way to go. If you're facing a complex challenge that requires a deep dive into strategy, efficiency improvements, or technological adoption, consulting services offer the depth and breadth of expertise you need.

In essence, while both staff augmentation and consulting services provide flexible, cost-effective solutions without the commitment of full-time hires, they serve distinctly different purposes: augmentation for immediate, skill-specific team expansion, and consulting for strategic, problem-solving expertise.

Staff Augmentation vs Consulting Differences – Bluebird

Looking to expand your team with permanent hires?

Tech Recruitment

Would you like to expand your team with permanent hires? We have all the resources, domain-specific expertise and over a decade of experience to find the right remote IT/ tech professionals for you.

Need extra hands or specialized skills on your tech project?

IT Staff Augmentation

Whether it's for a fixed duration or a longer period of time, our staff augmentation services enable you to scale your tech team lightning fast—with the experienced professionals your project needs.

Staff Augmentation vs. Consulting: Involvement with daily operations

Staff Augmentation: High Involvement in Daily Operations

Staff augmentation integrates external professionals directly into your existing teams, often on a day-to-day basis. These individuals work alongside your permanent staff, following your organizational processes, methodologies, and schedules. Their involvement with daily operations is typically high because they're essentially an extension of your current workforce. They might participate in regular meetings, collaborate on projects, and contribute to daily tasks, all while operating under your company's management and culture.
For example, if you augment your team with a software developer, this person would actively participate in the coding, debugging, and collaborating on the project at hand, just like any other in-house developer. They're in the thick of the daily grind, contributing directly to operational tasks and objectives.

Consulting: Strategic Involvement with Selective Operational Engagement

Consultants, conversely, are typically less involved in the day-to-day operations of your business. Their role is more strategic and advisory. Consultants analyze, recommend, and advise on best practices, strategies, and solutions to improve your business operations, solve specific problems, or capitalize on new opportunities. Their involvement with daily operations is more selective and usually focused on areas where strategic changes are being implemented.

However, this doesn't mean consultants are completely detached from operations. They might work closely with senior management to understand operational workflows, identify bottlenecks, and suggest improvements. But their primary focus is on high-level strategy rather than day-to-day task execution.

For instance, a consulting firm might help you streamline your IT operations or suggest a new project management framework. While they'll deeply understand your daily operations to make these recommendations, their direct involvement in those operations is limited compared to staff augmentation. Their engagement is more about guiding the change rather than executing it.

Choosing between staff augmentation and consulting depends on your specific needs—whether you require immediate, hands-on assistance with your operations or strategic guidance to navigate broader business challenges.
Staff Augmentation vs Consulting – Bluebird

Staff Augmentation vs. Consulting: Let’s Talk Costs

Determining which option—staff augmentation or consulting services—is more costly depends significantly on your project's specifics, the duration of the engagement, and the type of expertise required. However, we can outline some general considerations:

Consulting Services tend to be perceived as more expensive upfront, primarily because consultants are often sought for their high-level expertise, strategic insight, and the ability to solve complex problems.

Good consultants bring a wealth of experience and specialized knowledge that can command higher rates, especially for short-term engagements focused on strategic guidance, problem identification, and solution design. The value here is in the quality of the strategic advice and the potential long-term savings or efficiencies gained from implementing their recommendations.

Staff Augmentation, on the other hand, is generally seen as a more budget-friendly option for increasing workforce capacity or adding specific technical skills to your team on a flexible basis. The cost is more straightforward, often based on the daily or project-based rates of the augmented staff.

While this can add up over time, especially for longer engagements, the overall investment might be lower than hiring a consulting firm, especially if the need is purely for additional manpower or specific technical skills without requiring high-level strategic input.

Staff Augmentation Vs. Consulting: All Things Considered

  1. 1
    Duration: For short-term needs, consulting might seem more costly due to higher hourly rates or project fees. However, for longer engagements, the cost of staff augmentation can accumulate, potentially surpassing the one-time investment in consulting services that deliver a strategic roadmap or solution.
  2. 2
    Outcome and ROI: Consulting services can offer a higher return on investment in situations where strategic guidance can lead to significant business improvements, cost savings, or revenue generation over time. In contrast, staff augmentation might offer a more immediate, though potentially less strategic, boost to your team's capabilities.
  3. 3
    Scope and Expertise: The broader and more complex your needs (e.g., digital transformation, entering new markets, or implementing advanced technology), the more likely you are to benefit from consulting services, despite the higher initial costs. For straightforward projects requiring additional manpower or specific technical skills, augmentation is likely more cost-efficient.

However, the number one consideration when choosing between them should be purpose—how well the approach suits your current situation—not just cost. While budget considerations are important, aligning the choice with your specific needs, project goals, and desired outcomes ensures that you leverage the most suitable option for your situation.

Whether it’s augmenting your team with specialized skills or seeking strategic consulting to navigate complex challenges, selecting the right approach based on purpose can maximize the effectiveness and impact of the external expertise you bring into your organization.

Staff Augmentation vs Consulting: Comparing Benefits

Both staff augmentation and consulting have their unique benefits and. It’s essential to evaluate these factors to decide which approach best fits your business needs.

Benefits of Staff Augmentation:

  1. 1
    Access to skilled professionals without the need for long-term commitments.
  2. 2
    Efficient scaling of the workforce to meet business needs quickly.
  3. 3
    Cost-effective compared to hiring full-time employees.
  4. 4
    Control over the scope of work and job functions of the external professionals.

Benefits of Consulting:

  1. 1
    Access to specialized knowledge and expertise in a particular area.
  2. 2
    Objective and impartial guidance on specific projects or issues.
  3. 3
    Can lead to improvements in processes, decision-making, and problem-solving.
  4. 4
    Provides a fresh perspective and new ideas to the organization.

The decision to use staff augmentation or consulting depends on various factors such as cost, expertise, flexibility, and control. Consider your specific business needs, project requirements, and long-term goals before making a decision.


For IT Staff Augmentation

Staff Augmentation vs Consulting: FAQs

What is the primary focus of staff augmentation vs consulting?

Staff Augmentation: Primarily focuses on increasing the workforce to meet project or operational demands.

Consulting: Focuses on providing strategic advice and solutions to business challenges.

What type of control can you expect to maintain with each approach?

Staff Augmentation: Allows businesses to maintain full control over the project and team management.

Consulting: Consultants may require a degree of control or autonomy to implement strategic changes.

How do the two approaches integrate into existing teams?

Staff Augmentation: Augmented staff integrate directly and work alongside existing team members.

Consulting: Consultants usually work with the leadership or project teams but remain separate from the core team.

Can either approach help with entering new markets or launching new products?

Staff Augmentation: Can provide the necessary manpower and technical skills for the development and launch phases.

Consulting: Offers strategic insights, market analysis, and planning expertise to ensure successful market entry or product launch.

When should I use staff augmentation vs consulting?

Staff augmentation is suitable when you need to quickly scale your workforce or require specialized skills for a specific project. It offers flexibility and control over the external professionals' roles and responsibilities.

Consulting is beneficial when you need expert advice and guidance on specific areas of your operations. It is ideal for solving complex problems, improving processes, or making strategic decisions.